Diagnostic
The cheapest way to find out whether there is anything here worth doing.
- Interviews
- A map of where the work and the knowledge sit
- A ranked list of what is worth building
- Cost and risk
- A written recommendation
IDG is the AI department you do not have to build. You operate your organization. We operate its AI capability.
We plan and build your AI systems, run them where you choose, under rules your leadership sets, and teach your people to use them.
Fig. 1Blue dropped on unruled paper. It beads up and runs off without soaking in.
Fig. 2An unprepared organization. Use placed at random, no rules drawn.
Staff are already pasting work into public tools leadership can't see.
Most organizations should not become AI companies. They should have an AI function. It does not have to be one they build.
Leadership should set the rules, not staff using tools nobody approved.
The blooms start in the rooms furthest from leadership.
Fig. 3One spot separates into six bands. Each reads alone or together.
Each one stands on its own. Bought singly or together.
The cheapest way to find out whether there is anything here worth doing.
Delivered into production rather than into a demo. Nothing gets ripped out.
We create the secure environment AI needs.
Who may see what, what needs a person, and paperwork a regulator can read.
Adoption is most of the work.
A named contact rather than a ticket queue.
Fig. 4One well, one trunk, six zones. Each new branch is shorter.
Leadership sets the rules once, at the well. Every system drawn from it inherits them.
A private AI workspace for your people. Your people use it three ways: ask it. assign it. or let it run.
Six kinds of system can draw from the same foundation, each one building on what is already there.
A question, answered from what your organization already holds, with its sources.
How do we send files to someone outside the organization?
Through the secure portal, once a manager has signed off.
Source: Information handling policy, section 3
A task handed off, with a point where a person approves it.
Draft the renewal letters for this month's contracts.
Drafts ready. Waiting at the approval point.
A recurring job, such as the Monday report, that runs on schedule and reports back.
The weekly operations report, prepared every Monday at 06:00 for a person to approve.
Your choice, decided workload by workload. Three perimeters, each one yours to choose.
Fig. 5An office plan. The work spreads from one machine under a desk and stops at the outer wall.
Your information does not have to leave the building. The office walls are the boundary.
Fig. 6A perimeter in your own account.
Never a public tool.
Fig. 7A perimeter inside a perimeter.
Fig. 8The boundary, close up. Each line left behind is one entry in the record.
| Who asked | What was used | What came back |
|---|---|---|
| Finance lead | Supplier contracts folder | Summary of renewal terms |
| Front desk | Visitor policy | An answer, with its source |
| Operations | This week's figures | Draft report, approved by a person |
| Research | Approved outside sources | A cross-checked brief |
Fig. 9The same device. Zones take colour once people are taught. Later the model changes; the channels do not move.
We would rather deploy less and have it used.
A named contact rather than a ticket queue.
The model underneath can be swapped as better ones arrive, while your setup stays put.
Documented well enough that another engineer could take it over.
The ABA's ethics guidance (Formal Opinion 512) says a lawyer needs the client's informed consent before client information goes into a self-learning AI tool.
Preparers generally need the taxpayer's consent before using or disclosing return information (IRC §7216).
Staff are already pasting work into public tools leadership can't see.
There is no industry edition.
Retained the way you retain counsel, auditors or a security firm: named people, defined scope, a fee.
Fig. 10 · Every part of the organization reached
Or email hello@idg.consulting